I’m up to my usual tricks again….digging about and trying to understand the dynamics of an unfolding situation that just appears to have the hallmarks of a long, hidden hand process that’s been potentially unfolding for some time.
Let’s rewind back to September and October 2018.
This was the period in Brexit talks where we had an ‘impasse’.
It was all over the news for weeks. Deadlock this, impasse that…the burning issue at that time was the Irish Backstop and the possibility of getting and extension to leave at a later date.
With everything leading up to this moment, including the years of failed negotiations, the Lancaster House speech and the seemingly incompetent Conservative government and opposition, it was as clear as day that the UK would find itself at the mercy of the EU in asking for an extension, but then you have to wonder, why did the UK position itself to be at the mercy of the very thing they were trying to leave?
During these months of ‘impasse’, Nigel Farage and his select few followers, namely Nadine Holroyd, Phillip Bassey, Catherine Blaiklock and Michael Mcgough set up The Brexit Party.
The Brexit Party was incorporated with Companies House on 23rd November 2018, which believe it or not is just 1 day after the draft Political Declaration was released by the UK Government after agreeing it with the European Union.
On reading the articles of application submitted to Companies House, Catherine Blaiklock, acting as secretary signed the application on the 22nd November, the day the draft Political Declaration was released into the public domain. What are the chance of that? Talk about coincidences…
The earliest release of the Draft I can find is at 1500 on the 22nd November. That means, Catherine must have submitted the application between 1500 and 1700 on the 22nd of November, or if not, it was pre-emptive (odd since no one knew about the agreement)…
Up until the 22nd November, there must have been discussions amongst the ‘Brexit Party’ creators on how to go about creating the party and registering it. This will have all happened prior to the draft political declaration being released…so how did they know what was going to be in that draft political declaration and that it was even going to be agreed?
As of April 2019, Nigel Farage has just launched the party, platformed 100% by the BBC. He is claiming that the Brexit Party will sweep up the votes at the EU elections in May and send a strong message back to the EU…and yes, he has a bus….
But why would they set up a Brexit Party if they believed we would be out of the EU on the 29th March 2019, and furthermore, why would Catherine Blaiklock et al appoint Nigel Farage, Phillip Bassey and Jack Mcgough as directors of the Brexit party on the very day we were meant to leave the EU, particularly when we weren’t meant to leave until 2300 on the 29th March, yet all three were appointed prior to this time?
Again, I ask, who is providing Catherine et al with information that wasn’t in the public domain as there is no other logical explaination for the apparent coincidental moments that are perfectly aligned with the political stars.
When you look at those people listed on Companies House who are involved in the Brexit Party and you follow the links, Catherine Blaiklock is listed as having 1 appointment (the Brexit Party), however, when you type her name into Companies House as a separate search term, she is in fact linked to two active and two inactive businesses, now you could argue that its possible it’s another Catherine Blaiklock, but the DoB on all three active companies is the same, April 1963 and the registered addresses on the applications (active and in-active) are the same. Why has Companies House not linked Catherine to these other businesses?
If you apply the same logic to Phillip Victor Bassey, he is listed under the Brexit Party as holding 1 appointment, yet he is in fact holding 11. 4 positions in active companies and 7 in in-active companies. Why has Companies House failed to link these together?
When you look into the companies associated with Phillip Bassey, Nadine Holroyds name pops up time and time again. Nadine is also listed on the Brexit Partys registration as only holding 1 appointment, yet she holds 4 secretary roles for Basseys linked businesses…again, why has Companies House failed to link this?
Mr Michael Mcgough is the final person linked to the Brexit Party on Companies House. He is listed as having or had 8 links to other businesses, one of which, Freedom Association Ltd, happens to be a business where Sir Mark Worthington holds a Directorship.
Mark was recently appointed the ‘independent’ HS2 Construction Commissioner by the UK Government, even though he is not ‘independent’ as Mark was was Private Secretary to former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher from 1992 until her death in 2013. He also served as Director of her Private Office and Director of the Margaret Thatcher Foundation. During that time, he was Lady Thatcher’s most senior advisor and dealt with leading politicians in both the UK and around the world.
Sir Mark was a founding board member of the Bruges Group and a board member of Conservative Way Forward from 2006-2010. He is an advisor to the Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and to the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom at the Heritage Foundation in Washington DC.
I’m not overly sure how appointing Mark as an independent commissioner to investigate unresolved disputes and provide independent advice on how to make a complaint regards HS2 isn’t a conflict of interest?
I’m not sure how many of you have taken the time to read the Brexit Party memorandum of understanding as listed on Companies House, but let me pick out a couple of objectives that might make you sit up and take notice.
3(ii) preserve the integrity of the United Kingdom by campaigning, in accordance with its belief in free world trade, for the negotiation of suitable and equitable trade agreements with the EU. The Company would expect the European Union and the United Kingdom to respect and preserve all the trade protocols and agreements negotiated under the auspices of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade and the World Trade Organisation;
3(iv) campaign for a programme of national revival and, to that end, promote a full range of long term domestic policies at parliamentary and local elections
3(v) work to free individuals, families and businesses alike from excessive government interference in the conduct of their affairs and seek to return authority and responsible autonomy to all ;evels of local government, whether borough, city or district, whilst rejecting the idea of an extra layer of government in the form of regional assemblies, which would alienate voters by distancing them further from government, and undermine the principle democratically accountable local government;
3(h) to do all such other things as are incidental to the attainment of furtherance of the said objects or any of them.
So folks, here you have it. We have a political party with 3 of its objectives related to getting rid of devolution, push national revival and preserve the integrity of the UK and to achieve it by any means possible.
This group set up their party on the very day the political declaration was agreed between the EU and the UKG, even though nobody knew about it until it was agreed (except the Brexit Party founders), they then appoint directors at least 6 hours before we were actually due to leave the EU and before Mays extensions guaranteed participation in the upcoming EU elections and three of the 5 persons don’t have linked accounts on Companies House, whilst one of those persons was Margaret Thatchers closest advisor and a founding member of the Bruges Group. Some of the supporters of the Bruges Group are none other than…
Mark Francois, Nigel Farage, Daniel Hannan, Kate Hoey, Giesla Stuart, Ian Duncan Smith and John Redwood…
All of whom are given uninterrupted platforms on the UK mainstream media.
Still think this is all a coincidence?
I’d go as far as to say there is fairly strong evidence that Brexit is being used as a tool to stop Scottish independence via the stripping of Powers and the removal of the legislative competence of Holyrood.
Many of us have suspected this would happen, now it seems it’s one of the sole aims of the Brexit Party.
BetterTogether 2.0 was never going to be out in the open, it was always going to be covertly subtle.
Its time Yes 2.0 started its campaign, and started it soon!
**Note, all of this information is available on Companies House and via Custom Range searches online and in the public domain
MacAlba 